// independent comparison

Sprinto vs Thoropass

Updated
Mar 2026
Read Time
5 min
Sources
G2, Capterra

Sprinto and Thoropass both target companies chasing SOC 2 or ISO 27001, but they take very different paths to get there. Sprinto is a software-first platform built in Bangalore that competes on automation depth and price. Thoropass, based in New York, bundles its compliance platform with in-house auditors so you can manage readiness and the audit itself through one vendor.

Quick Verdict DEPENDS ON USE CASE

Sprinto wins on price and integration depth. Thoropass wins for teams that want a single vendor handling both software and audit, especially first-time compliance buyers.

// quick pick

Who Should Pick What

Sprinto
choose this tool if
  • You want the lowest possible platform cost and your team can manage a separate auditor relationship
  • Your tech stack relies on integrations that matter (Sprinto's 200+ catalog is twice the size of Thoropass's)
  • You're a cost-conscious startup that already has compliance experience and just needs good automation
View Sprinto Profile →
Thoropass
choose this tool if
  • You're doing SOC 2 or ISO 27001 for the first time and want one vendor to handle everything, including the audit
  • You want pen testing included in your compliance package rather than sourcing it separately
  • You'd rather pay more for a single relationship than coordinate between a platform vendor and an audit firm
View Thoropass Profile →
// tldr

Key Differences

1
Sprinto starts at ~$6K/yr vs Thoropass platform at ~$8.7K/yr (audit subscription adds ~$5.8K/yr on top)
2
Sprinto has 200+ integrations; Thoropass has 100+
3
Thoropass includes in-house auditors; Sprinto is software-only (you find your own auditor)
4
Thoropass includes pen testing with 90-day free retesting; Sprinto partners with Astra Security as an add-on
5
Sprinto's G2 rating is 4.8 across 1,500 reviews; Thoropass sits at 4.7 with 576 reviews
// head to head

Side-by-Side Data

Sprinto
Thoropass
Company
Founded 2020 2019
Headquarters Bangalore, India New York, USA
Target size Startup, SMB, Mid-market Startup, SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise
Pricing
Starting price ~$6,000/yr (est.) ~$8,700/yr (confirmed)
Model Custom/enterprise only Hybrid
Free trial No No
Frameworks
SOC 2 Yes Yes
ISO 27001 Yes Yes
HIPAA Yes Yes
PCI DSS Yes Yes
GDPR Yes Yes
FedRAMP Yes Yes
Total frameworks 20+ 30+
Core Features
Evidence collection Fully automated Partially automated
Continuous monitoring Yes Yes
Auditor portal Yes Yes
Vendor risk mgmt Yes Yes
Trust center Yes Yes
Security questionnaires Yes Yes
Integrations
Total count 200 100
Key platforms AWS, Azure, GCP, GitHub, Jira, Slack, Okta, Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Datadog, BambooHR, Gusto, Rippling, Cloudflare, DigitalOcean, Heroku AWS, Azure, GCP, GitHub, Jira, Slack, Okta, Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Datadog, Jamf, BambooHR, Gusto, MongoDB, Cloudflare
Ratings
G2 4.8 ★★★★★ (1.5k+) 4.7 ★★★★★ (576+)
Capterra 4.7 ★★★★★ (84+) 5 ★★★★★ (1+)
Data sources: Pricing and features from vendor websites, G2, and Capterra. Re-verified every 90 days. Last check: March 2026. Spot an error? Report it.
Highlighted rows show where the two tools differ
// pricing

Pricing Comparison

Sprinto's single-framework pricing starts around $4K-$6K per year, with advanced plans running $15K-$25K for multi-entity setups. Thoropass charges separately for platform (~$8.7K/yr) and audit subscriptions (~$5.8K/yr for SOC 2), with a median contract around $30K/yr when bundled. The comparison isn't entirely apples-to-apples because Thoropass's price includes an auditor, which Sprinto customers pay for separately. If you factor in a third-party SOC 2 audit at $10K-$20K, Sprinto's total cost could match or exceed Thoropass's bundle. Neither company publishes transparent pricing pages with dollar amounts.

// features

Feature Comparison

Both platforms cover the core compliance automation features: continuous monitoring, policy management, vendor risk management, security questionnaire automation, trust centers, and employee training. Sprinto edges ahead on integration volume (200+ vs 100+) and is rated as fully automated for evidence collection, while Thoropass is partially automated with some manual fine-tuning reported by users. Thoropass's standout feature is its bundled audit capability, including pen testing with 90-day free retesting and First Pass AI for audit preparation. Sprinto counters with a more affordable base price and a desktop agent for endpoint monitoring.

The Bottom Line

Sprinto is the better pure platform at a better price. Thoropass is the better end-to-end experience. Companies with compliance experience and tight budgets should lean toward Sprinto. First-timers who value simplicity over savings will find Thoropass's bundled approach worth the premium.

// related

More Comparisons

All Sprinto alternatives → All Thoropass alternatives →
Data sources: Comparison based on vendor documentation, G2, and Capterra reviews. Last updated: Mar 2026. Next re-check: June 2026. Spot an error? Report it.