// independent comparison

Secureframe vs Thoropass

Updated
Mar 2026
Read Time
5 min
Sources
G2, Capterra

Secureframe and Thoropass offer two distinct models for getting compliant. Secureframe is a compliance automation platform: you use the software to prepare, then bring in your own audit firm for the actual certification. Thoropass bundles the platform and the audit together, with in-house auditors who work inside the same tool. Both support SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and other major frameworks. The question is whether you want a better software tool with more integrations and framework coverage, or a simpler end-to-end experience with one vendor.

Quick Verdict DEPENDS ON USE CASE

Secureframe wins on framework count (40+ vs 30+), integrations (300+ vs 100+), government/CMMC compliance, and pricing predictability. Thoropass wins for teams wanting bundled audit services, included pen testing, and zero auditor coordination.

// quick pick

Who Should Pick What

Secureframe
choose this tool if
  • You need government compliance frameworks (CMMC, GovRAMP, TX-RAMP) where Secureframe has purpose-built products and Thoropass doesn't compete
  • Your tech stack needs 300+ integrations for automated evidence collection without manual uploads
  • You already have an audit firm you trust or want the flexibility to shop for the best audit pricing
View Secureframe Profile →
Thoropass
choose this tool if
  • You want one vendor for platform, audit, and pen testing without coordinating between multiple firms
  • You're doing your first SOC 2 or ISO 27001 and would rather have auditors embedded in your compliance tool than manage a separate relationship
  • Bundled CREST-accredited pen testing with free retesting matters for your security program
View Thoropass Profile →
// tldr

Key Differences

1
Thoropass bundles in-house auditors and CREST-accredited pen testing into its platform. Secureframe is software-only with access to compliance experts but requires a separate audit firm
2
Secureframe connects to 300+ tools versus Thoropass's 100+, a 3x gap that means significantly less manual evidence uploads
3
Secureframe supports 40+ frameworks including CMMC, GovRAMP, and TX-RAMP. Thoropass supports 30+ but lacks Secureframe's government compliance depth
4
Secureframe starts around $7,500 per year (software only)
Thoropass's median all-in contract is $30,700 but includes audit services
5
Both score 4.7 on G2
Secureframe has more reviews (789 vs 576) and a higher Capterra rating (4.8 vs limited Capterra data for Thoropass)
// head to head

Side-by-Side Data

Secureframe
Thoropass
Company
Founded 2020 2019
Headquarters San Francisco, USA New York, USA
Target size Startup, SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise Startup, SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise
Pricing
Starting price ~$7,500/yr (est.) ~$8,700/yr (confirmed)
Model Custom/enterprise only Hybrid
Free trial Yes No
Frameworks
SOC 2 Yes Yes
ISO 27001 Yes Yes
HIPAA Yes Yes
PCI DSS Yes Yes
GDPR Yes Yes
FedRAMP Yes Yes
Total frameworks 40+ 30+
Core Features
Evidence collection Fully automated Partially automated
Continuous monitoring Yes Yes
Auditor portal Yes Yes
Vendor risk mgmt Yes Yes
Trust center Yes Yes
Security questionnaires Yes Yes
Integrations
Total count 300 100
Key platforms AWS, Azure, GCP, Google Workspace, Okta, Microsoft 365, GitHub, Jira, Slack, Datadog, CrowdStrike, Jamf, BambooHR, Gusto, Rippling, Heroku, DigitalOcean, Cloudflare AWS, Azure, GCP, GitHub, Jira, Slack, Okta, Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Datadog, Jamf, BambooHR, Gusto, MongoDB, Cloudflare
Ratings
G2 4.7 ★★★★★ (789+) 4.7 ★★★★★ (576+)
Capterra 4.8 ★★★★★ (57+) 5 ★★★★★ (1+)
Data sources: Pricing and features from vendor websites, G2, and Capterra. Re-verified every 90 days. Last check: March 2026. Spot an error? Report it.
Highlighted rows show where the two tools differ
// pricing

Pricing Comparison

The pricing comparison requires thinking about total cost, not just platform cost. Secureframe's Fundamentals tier starts around $7,500 per year, with an average deal price of $20,500 annually. But the audit is separate. A first-time SOC 2 Type 2 from a third-party firm costs $15,000 to $50,000. Total first-year cost for Secureframe plus an external audit: $22,500 to $70,000. Thoropass bundles both. Platform starts at $8,700 per year, SOC 2 audit subscription at $5,800 per year, with a median all-in contract of $30,700. For a first-time SOC 2, Thoropass's bundled pricing often beats Secureframe-plus-separate-auditor. Secureframe's renewal pricing is predictable (5 to 10 percent annual increases). Thoropass's pricing structure is less transparent at renewal. Adding frameworks costs roughly $7,500 each on Secureframe. Thoropass claims up to 90 percent evidence crossover across frameworks, which can reduce multi-framework audit costs through shared evidence.

// features

Feature Comparison

As compliance automation software, Secureframe has clear advantages. Its 300+ integrations are three times Thoropass's count, covering more of the typical tech stack natively. Its cross-framework mapping shows how SOC 2 evidence applies to ISO 27001, letting teams start a second framework at about 60 percent completion. Secureframe Defense is the only purpose-built CMMC certification product on the market. And its AI evidence validation checks uploaded documents against control requirements in real time. Thoropass's strengths are in the service layer. In-house auditors review your evidence before the formal audit, catching problems early. CREST-accredited pen testing with 90-day free retesting is bundled in, not a separate procurement exercise. Smart Sort AI (January 2026) lets teams migrating from Secureframe or other tools upload exported data and automatically map it to Thoropass's audit requirements. Both offer trust centers, vendor risk management, policy management, and security questionnaire automation.

The Bottom Line

Secureframe is the better compliance automation platform with wider framework support, deeper integrations, and government compliance capabilities that Thoropass can't match. Thoropass is the simpler end-to-end solution for companies that value having one vendor handle everything from prep to audit to pen testing. For government or defense compliance, Secureframe wins by default. For a first-time SOC 2 where you don't have an auditor yet and just want the simplest path, Thoropass's bundled model saves you the hassle of finding and managing a separate firm.

// related

More Comparisons

All Secureframe alternatives → All Thoropass alternatives →
Data sources: Comparison based on vendor documentation, G2, and Capterra reviews. Last updated: Mar 2026. Next re-check: June 2026. Spot an error? Report it.