// independent comparison

Sprinto vs Strike Graph

Updated
Mar 2026
Read Time
5 min
Sources
G2, Capterra

Sprinto and Strike Graph compete for the same buyer: startups and SMBs that need SOC 2 or ISO 27001 without spending Vanta money. Both are newer entrants (founded 2020) positioning themselves as affordable alternatives to market leaders. But they take different approaches to affordability.

Quick Verdict SPRINTO

Sprinto offers stronger automation, more integrations, and better G2 reviews at a comparable price. Strike Graph's free tier is a real advantage for bootstrapped startups, but Sprinto is the better platform once you're paying.

// quick pick

Who Should Pick What

Sprinto
choose this tool if
  • You want the deepest automation available at this price point, with 200+ integrations that minimize manual evidence work
  • You're past the evaluation stage and ready to commit to a paid platform with strong customer support
  • G2 social proof matters: Sprinto's 1,500 reviews at 4.8 provide significantly more validation than Strike Graph's 166
View Sprinto Profile →
Strike Graph
choose this tool if
  • You're bootstrapped and want to start with a free tier before committing any budget
  • Transparent pricing is non-negotiable and you refuse to do a sales call before seeing costs
  • You plan to add multiple frameworks over time and want a graph-based architecture that reuses controls across certifications
View Strike Graph Profile →
// tldr

Key Differences

1
Strike Graph has a free tier; Sprinto does not
2
Sprinto has 200+ integrations; Strike Graph has 74
3
Sprinto's evidence collection is fully automated; Strike Graph's is partially automated
4
Sprinto has 1,500 G2 reviews (4.8); Strike Graph has 166 (4.7)
5
Strike Graph publishes pricing transparently ($9K/$18K/$27K tiers); Sprinto requires a sales call
// head to head

Side-by-Side Data

Sprinto
Strike Graph
Company
Founded 2020 2020
Headquarters Bangalore, India Seattle, WA, USA
Target size Startup, SMB, Mid-market Startup, SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise
Pricing
Starting price ~$6,000/yr (est.) ~$9,000/yr (confirmed)
Model Custom/enterprise only Hybrid
Free trial No Yes
Frameworks
SOC 2 Yes Yes
ISO 27001 Yes Yes
HIPAA Yes Yes
PCI DSS Yes Yes
GDPR Yes Yes
FedRAMP Yes Yes
Total frameworks 20+ 29+
Core Features
Evidence collection Fully automated Partially automated
Continuous monitoring Yes Yes
Auditor portal Yes No
Vendor risk mgmt Yes Yes
Trust center Yes Yes
Security questionnaires Yes Yes
Integrations
Total count 200 74
Key platforms AWS, Azure, GCP, GitHub, Jira, Slack, Okta, Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Datadog, BambooHR, Gusto, Rippling, Cloudflare, DigitalOcean, Heroku AWS, GCP, Azure (AD/DevOps/Resource Manager), GitHub, GitLab, Jira Cloud, Google Drive, Office 365, Confluence, ServiceNow, Workday, BambooHR, Gusto, ADP, DigitalOcean, Oracle Cloud, ClickUp, SAP SuccessFactors
Ratings
G2 4.8 ★★★★★ (1.5k+) 4.7 ★★★★★ (166+)
Capterra 4.7 ★★★★★ (84+) 4.7 ★★★★★ (9+)
Data sources: Pricing and features from vendor websites, G2, and Capterra. Re-verified every 90 days. Last check: March 2026. Spot an error? Report it.
Highlighted rows show where the two tools differ
// pricing

Pricing Comparison

Strike Graph's pricing is the most transparent in the compliance space: $9K/yr (Certify), $18K/yr (Scale), $27K/yr (Enterprise), with a free Launch tier. Additional frameworks cost $2K-$8K each. Sprinto doesn't publish prices but starts around $4K-$6K/yr for a single framework, rising to $15K-$25K for advanced plans. For a single SOC 2 certification, Sprinto is likely cheaper. For budget-conscious founders who want to explore before committing, Strike Graph's free tier lets you assess readiness without spending anything. The catch: Strike Graph charges separately for audit services ($4K-$8K/yr), and per-attachment overage fees can add up at lower tiers.

// features

Feature Comparison

Both platforms cover the basics: continuous monitoring, policy management, vendor risk management, trust centers, security questionnaire automation, and employee training. Sprinto pulls ahead on automation. Its fully automated evidence collection across 200+ integrations means less manual work and fewer gaps before audits. Strike Graph's graph-based architecture is clever for cross-framework mapping (adding ISO 27001 after SOC 2 reuses existing controls automatically), but users report more manual evidence tasks and less guidance on mapping. Strike Graph includes pen testing; Sprinto partners with Astra Security as an add-on. Strike Graph offers an AI Security Assistant and patent-pending Verify AI for evidence validation, while Sprinto's AI powers its questionnaire automation.

The Bottom Line

Sprinto is the better platform for teams ready to invest in compliance automation. The automation is deeper, the integrations are broader, and the G2 track record is much larger. Strike Graph earns its spot for one specific reason: that free tier. For a bootstrapped startup that needs to assess SOC 2 readiness before spending anything, Strike Graph is the only option in this comparison that lets you do that. Once you're paying, though, Sprinto delivers more value per dollar.

// related

More Comparisons

All Sprinto alternatives → All Strike Graph alternatives →
Data sources: Comparison based on vendor documentation, G2, and Capterra reviews. Last updated: Mar 2026. Next re-check: June 2026. Spot an error? Report it.